Jobs for the boys

No, I am not talking about 10 Downing Street. I am talking about the England Cricket Team. But what does it take to get rid of these people? By this point, the Captain, Coaches, Director of England Cricket and ECB Chief Executive should have been given marching orders. To say nothing of the Prime Minister.

Ashley Giles should have gone after that dreadful interview he gave a few weeks ago, in which he blamed everyone else for all the problems of the world but took credit for looking after the players mental wellbeing. I would question how much good it does them to be thrown into another Pominshambles Ashes tour. I have never seen Giles as England Management material – I thought we had given up on that a few years ago. Giles is out of his depth, yet has the job of giving the ECB a report into what has gone wrong. That will take 2 minutes…..pick the wrong players, give them zero preparation, totally overload them. Thats your written report Ashley.

Tom Harrison of course should be gone as soon as the conversation came up about that £2.1 million bonus. A failure bonus? That should have been enough on its own, but after England failed to win every Ashes since he has been in post plus failed to qualify for the T20 World Cup Final. Not to mention the Racism scandal. He seems to be untouchable.

Then we have Chris Silverwood. Things were going ok until he was given control of selection, and since then it has been a shambles. Though I think we had doubts from day 1 – Essex and England are somewhat different. But Ray Illingworth had already shown us in 1995 that you need a separate coach and selector. I guess we cannot blame Silverwood for that Giles inspired piece of stupidity (Giles again). It would be harsh to point out that England’s ‘least bad’ result came when Silverwood was absent…but he is paid for this stuff so I am going to be harsh. England did better without him in Sydney. By now he should be gone and a Selection Panel should have been created ahead of the West Indies Tour.

It is not just Silverwood though is it? Lots of the same names have been around for a long time. Graham Thorpe was one of my heros in the 90s and should be regarded as one of England’s finest middle order bats. But the England batters have failed consistently for years – pretty much since England got rid of Graham Gooch actually. Thorpe is credited with unlocking Joe Root’s run of brilliance by telling Root to be more selfish. Perhaps Thorpe is a great mentor, but he has not delivered an England batting line up. Time to say goodbye.

And we have to come to Joe Root. Sorry Joe, but it really would be best if you stepped aside out of your own choice. But if that is not happening, someone needs to make the decision for him. Keeping people in a job because nobody else can do the job is a terrible place to be. Give someone a chance and they might actually show some ability – but they won’t if not given an opportunity. Root is not cut out for Captaincy and is not getting any better at it. His batting is so important to this team, and sadly he cannot bat in Australia. But perhaps if he has not been carrying the Sunday School second 11 for years he might have  had more chance. It is time for Joe to go.

But the worst thing is that all these people seem to have backing, particularly Root and Silverwood. Vice Captain Ben Stokes backs up Root, who backs up Silverwood. Failed Wicket Keeper Jos Buttler speaks of still wanting to conquer test match cricket. Jimmy Anderson wants to keep going. Since when was it any of these people’s choice? You fail, you move aside or get moved, and then you let someone else have a go.

It speaks of an insider culture, where the likes of Stokes, Buttler and Root carry the player power. It is time to stop. It is time for a completely new team. That means a new Captain. If Stokes does not want to be Captain, it means a new Vice Captain. It means a new Wicket Keeper. It means a new batting line up (yes, yet another). It means another set of bowlers. Yes, even Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson need to retire, or be retired.

To paraphrase Teresa May…..a new start means….a new start.

We are annoyed

The latest ‘Ashes Shambles’ is simply not acceptable, and my impression is that this time the English fans are cross. Even the Barmy Army have expressed a certain amount of frustration which in itself is quite a statement.

Let me just have a little recap of where we have got to from an England perspective. Let us initially go back a little bit to 2019:

  • 2019 was been the year of the World Cup. Back then even the most diehard Test Match Fanatic was prepared permit the focus to be on One Day Cricket. Let us not forget that England fans were sick of being ‘World Cup no hopers’.
  • Overall in 2019 the Test Match Team got away with it in that they held Australia to a 2-2 draw in the Ashes in England. However, it was the first time England had not beaten Australia at home since 2001, and the year also saw a loss to New Zealand and a number of sub-100 scores. It was a sign of what was to come.

However, 2020 seemed like it was a ‘bright new dawn’. Maybe hindsight is a wonderful thing, but things did seem to be on the way up.

  • England beat South Africa away despite a terrible start to the test match series. In the first test match England faced an illness crisis – and it is hard not to wonder about Covid-19 given what was about to happen to the world.
  • That South Africa team was not a strong team, and that is more evident now then at the time. However, it was a good series for Dom Sibley, Ollie Pope and Dom Bess. Zak Crawley showed potential, and with Rory Burns coming off a good, though lucky, 2019 we saw an England batting line up coming together.
  • England beat West Indies and Pakistan at home. England have since found out how hard it is to be the touring team in Covid times, but England did play well.
  • During the Home Covid Summer, the Burns / Sibley partnership worked, though both had very odd techniques. Crawley had been doubtful until be scored 267 in the last test. Jos Buttler also had enjoyed a good summer and Ben Stokes batted well (though both bowling and catching were not so good – he was perhaps understandably distracted by his father’s health).
  • England seemed to have lots of bowlers available, and had a logical rest and rotation policy going where Anderson and Broad never played together.

The good form continued into 2021 and we saw evidence of a Joe Root breakthrough as he began his amazing year. England won the first three games of the year. The Sri Lanka side was hardly steller, but the conditions were not easy. The victory against India was spectacular. However, even then, we were concerned about the reliance on Root.

Since that first test match against India, it has been a disgrace. I am certain that it is no coincidence that this is when the Chairman of Selectors was scrapped. The mistakes began in India. Of particular note:

  • After 3 victories, the side was changed significntly. I would ssuggest Jos Buttler has not been the same since he went home from India.
  • England played 4 fast bowlers in the day night game. England tried a similar thing in 1992 and we know how well that went. But that was where the Anderson and Broad rotation policy was thrown away, and the rotation randomisation begain.

The Home Summer was so poor that I do not want to re-live it here, and so we reach the present day – the Ashes capitulation. And let us note a few things:

  • This is not a great Australian team by any means. I think this makes it all the more annoying. They are a good team, but not great.
  • The decision making has been incredibly bad. Amazingly so. The selection, the decisions at the toss and in the game…you could pick any number of decisions – the number of basic mistakes both before and during the tour is quite incredible.
  • The decision to go into Brisbane without both of Jimmy Anderson and Stuart Broad is as crazy as playing 4 fast bowlers in India.
  • The catching is diabolical. We are at the point where if the players cannot catch they need to be dropped. Surely this has contributed to the dropping of Burns – but also his technique was always going to fail down under

But let us come to the worst aspects of all this. Firstly, Selection. Constantly it seems as if they are picking the team for the previous game. If nothing else, look what the home team does – they picked the best bowlers in the first game. Yes, they lost bowlers due injury in the second game, but being 1-0 up made up for that. Whereas England bought in the best bowlers when they were already 1-0 down. Australia also always pick a spinner, without fail.

Worst of all is the lack of progress. Yes, we can easily list endless lists of names. Players such as Dom Sibley, Rory Burns, Haseeb Hamid, Zak Crawley, Ollie Pope, Dom Bess have regressed. The likes of Dawid Malan, Jos Buttler and Jonny Bairstow are treading water. Even coaches have changed over the years. It does feel a bit too cosy.

Yes, we have to direct some anger at the current coaching team. And even now, Chris Silverwood refuses to own up. He speaks of positives and says he would made the same (*STUPID*) selection decisions again. That is not only totally perplexing – it is incredibly disrespectful to the fans.

Silverwood does need to go and needs to be replaced. Joe Root also needs to step down as captain. But we need answers from higher up. Where is Ashley Giles? Where is Tom Harrison? How many Ashes do we have to loose before the ECB ‘top brass’ changes?

If I hear one more England representative talking about the positives of being 3-0 down…………………..

Cannot do ANYTHING

In 1986 it was said that England could not bat, could not bowl and could not field. Well, if Ian Botham and David Gower were tarred with that brush, how do you go about describing this lot?

Firstly, we have to ask questions of the management (and we will talk about Australia later). Can you seriously imagine Mike Gatting or Micky Stewart going up to Botham and Graeme Dilly on the 14th November 1986 in Brisbane and leaving them out? “Yes chaps, I know you are the best bowlers, but we think it would be better to throw away the first game and pick you in the second when we are already on the way to a 5-0 thrshing”.

Yet on the 8th December this year, that is exactly what Joe Root and Chris Silverwood did. Back in 2012, when Andrew Strauss’ England were top of the tree, they left out Stuart Broad and James Anderson for a test match against West Indies. It caused quite a reaction at the time. The fact is, it was a questionable decision for a top class team with an unassailable lead in the series. It is the sort of thing you can consider when you are winning. When you have lost virtually all of your games in the year, you have to pick your best players.

When it comes to selection, England are a shambles now. We are willing to cut some slack – Covid and injuries have been a nightmare combo. The loss of Jofra Archer was a cruel blow. But we also have to ask why all of England’s batters have regressed? I would list them but it would require a lot of space. Simply England pick test match batters who fail to kick on. Why, and when will someone own up? Graham Thorpe was my hero, but as a batting coach he is not having the desired impact on these players.

But even accepting all of that, Root and Silverwood are in a muddle, and they have created a situation where they have nobody else involved in team selection. The teams they are picking up are almost as mixed up as the crazy teams that Ray Illingworth chose in the mid 90s.

My view is that they are just making it too complicated. It seems like they keep picking the team that they should have picked in the team before. They are messing about with the basics. For example, you pick a spinner unless a compelling reason exists not to. Even on a dark day in Leeds (not that we can have test matches in Leeds these days) you would think twice about not picking a spinner (see England v South Africa in 2012). Pick the same spinner regularly and the captain and bowler will learn to work together and the bowler can get some match practice. But most of all…..PICK YOUR BEST PLAYERS.

We can expand the theme of not doing the basics to Rory Burns. I have always felt that Burns could not succeed down under. He probably will get the rest of the series now however badly he plays, but he does not deserve it. His technique is miles away from the coaching manual but we do not care about that. He is also miles away from common sense. I am sorry, but he is the only batter I have ever seen in international cricket who does not look at the bowler. You can stand where you want, but watching the bowler is pretty key. Staying still would help. In Brisbane he was so busy moving he missed a ball that Alistair Cook would be clipping through the leg side. We could maybe cope with that, but then Burns must be England’s least good catcher – and it is a low bar. We are at the point where we must consider just picking players who can catch, irrespective of runs and wickets.

Talking about basics, what about the No Balls. Ben Stokes and Ollie Robinson have done it. What are all these hundreds of coaches doing? Simple – in the nets, practice properly. Don’t permit no balls in practice and you know what, they will not happen in real games. Botham hardly ever bowled No Balls. Everyone wanted to blame the Umpire for not calling them. Well, that is pathetic as well – with modern technology every no ball must be called. But only 1 person makes front foot no balls happen. The bowler. Sack the bowling coach if he cannot ensure the basics of bowling legal deliveries.

So, you may gather I am not pleased. The worst thing about this Ashes tour is that it is so predicable. The result of the series is going to almost certainly be decided within 12 days of cricket. Somehow it has become normal for England to loose 5-0 in Australia. In 2006/7 it started, but that Australia team was brilliant. In 2013/4 it started to become the norm even against a pretty poor Australia. Now it is just inevitable.

People look back at the 1990s and laugh. But out of each Ashes tour someone came out with credability, and normally England won a game somewhere. In 1990/1, Gower and Mike Atherton made runs. In 1994/5, Darren Gough made himself known and Thorpe made runs, including a fine hundred in the last game. In 1998/9 England’s middle order was respectable, and Gough made the headlines again. In 2002/3 it was all about Michael Vaughan – and the fact that he conquered the Aussie bowlers must have been a factor at home in 2005.

It is time for England to show some fight. Pick the best players. Consistently. Score some hundreds – even when you loose. But most of all – SHOW SOME FIGHT.

A brief word about the Australia Management. Despite all the ‘crossing the line’ nonsense we hear from David Warner and co, despite the involvement of a Prime Minister, despite everything, we have Steve Smith, the Sandpaper Captain, back leading the team. Seriously, you telling me that this is acceptable? I am ok having him in the team. But Smith should not be Captain. Not that England can claim any moral high ground at all given everything. But no, Smith as Captain is a disgrace.

Not exactly to plan…

I thought I would close down my attempt to follow the 2021 English Cricket season.

To be honest, the main conclusion is that English (and Welsh) domestic cricket is hard to follow. In fact, it is chaos. So far, 2021 has been a disaster for the ECB. Of course, England still have time to turn the year round. Pigs might fly. But if I had to break down the disaster of 2021, two things stick out.

1. Rest and Randomise

Despite Rest and Rotation, Ben Stokes is out of action. The policy sounds sensible, but has been a complete disaster which should have been binned as soon as the wheels came off in India. Certainly, some of the movements in and out of the team for India were completely mad.

But the main problem is the injury list. It is endless, but to give a few examples:

  • Jofra Archer has hardly played since India and will miss The Ashes
  • Stuart Broad has not played since the New Zealand series and was rotated beforehand
  • Ben Stokes is taking an indefinite break, despite having only played 3 One Day Internationals for England since India
  • Ben Foakes, England’s most unlucky player bar Jack Leach, has been injured all summer
  • Jos Buttler has suffered injury
  • James Anderson, England’s best and oldest bowler has bowled endlessly this summer…and has hardly been rested at all

Now New Zealand did mange to do ‘Rest and Rotation’ for the second test match of the summer. But largely they pick a consistent team.

For Engand, players are missing games and then getting injured when they play. Rest and rotation seems to have created more injuries than it prevented. How can a team become used to playing together when the players never actually play together? Actually, the only answer is to play less cricket.

The other point is that the the public do not get to see the best players. People have said that ‘England could have found 15 players to tour Pakistan’. Well, I am not so sure about that given what is going on in neighbouring Afghanistan, but that is another matter – though one worth considering before you judge the players. But my point is that I do not want to watch ’15 players that England found somewhere’. I want to watch the best players. In 2021 I have hardly seen some them.

2. The best domestic One Day Cricket of 2021 was T20 Finals Day

Great Cricket all day on Finals Day – Picture from Edgbaston

It must surely be a difficulty for The ECB that the best One Day Cricket I have seen, domestically, this year was not The Hundred. I thought The Hundred was really good, but the best games I have seen were the 3 that took place on Finals Day.

It does give County Cricket the best fighting chance of survival though. I have limited sympathy for the Counties, and I do not really subscribe to the idea that they have been trampled all over by the ECB. Or that County Cricket is a good enough standard (it isn’t). It is outdated and confusing and hard to follow. I believe the Counties need to catch up with life and get into the 21st century.

The best way for the counties to survive is to ensure high quality cricket. That will stop The Hundred in its tracks. Even in this crazy year of 2021 the counties came up with the goods on finals day. It can be done even without the ECBs help. Focus on this and stop moaning about how badly treated the counties are.

Looking back

Let us briefly look back. England started the year on a high. They won both home series in 2020 and the ECB deserved a lot of credit (and still does) for saving the international fixture list. Yes, you can be critical of England for cancelling tours and not ‘repaying’ the favour, but in 2020 we faced the real possibility of not having any international cricket from April onwards.

The high continued when England were victorious in the first 3 outings of the year, which were all difficult assignments – though it was pretty much down to Joe Root, who has been a one man team all year. And then, in long format cricket anyway, it all came crashing down. England played a second string team against New Zealand that was not full strength either and escaped with a 1-0 series loss. It should have been 2-0 and those that said England should have taken on the chase at Lords were living in ‘cloud cuckoo land’. New Zealand showed themselves to be a classy team, the best team in the world, and the best test match cricket I have been all summer came from the Kiwis.

Throw away England

Eventually, the second England India series of the year started. England worked extremely hard to chuck away a game at Lords thanks to an hour of stupidity. Genuinely, it was lame cricket, which came after being saved by rain at Trent Bridge. India were ok at the Oval, and despite a nightmare in Leeds would probably have won at Old Trafford if they could have been bothered to turn up. I was disappointed by the India series.

England worked extremely hard to chuck away a game at Lords thanks to an hour of stupidity.  Genuinely, it was lame cricket

Short Form Success – but muddled T20 thinking?

In the middle of all this, England were having a good short format summer, though the 2019 World Cup Team is now a thing of history. That England were easily able to beat Pakistan in the 50 over games showed England’s One Day depth – this was genuinely a ‘C for Covid’ team due to an outbreak. Those 3 games have proved costly though; they must surely have impacted Ben Stokes wellbeing, and shortly afterwards he announced his ‘break’ from cricket.

And we still have no idea what the team will be for the World T20. England still have too many openers and not enough middle order specialists. One such specialist is Jos Buttler, who is opening and that means, assuming Jason Roy plays, that Jonny Bairstow bats at 4. This is the same Bairstow who could be considered England’s best One Day opener ever. I just don’t understand why Bairstow opening is not the first ‘inked in’ name and position.

Normally, a countries best ever One Day opener would open the batting in all One Day games. Not England. Picture from The Cricketer.

For now, we will not discuss the fact that England no longer has a Chairman of Selectors. But I think we can agree that Ed Smith did not do such a bad job, compared to what we have had since. Chris Silverwood needs to accept some help and not repeat the mistakes of the 90s Illingworth era.

The None Games

Sad scenes at Old Trafford. Pictures from ITV.

The biggest talking point of the season has to be the games that did not happen, both in England and in Pakistan. Despite positive noises this week, The Ashes remains in the balance. I am prepared to cut the boards and players some slack when it comes to travelling and touring at the moment. It is not easy.

I think the Pakistan situation is more challenging than is generally stated, but it was poorly handled by the ECB. It seemed to be the end for Ian Whatmore.

The problem has been bubbling for years. The players have too much cricket to play. It does seem to me that the same voices who moan about the overloaded fixture list are the ones who moan when games get called off. You cannot have it both ways.

Perhaps 2021 is that typing point. It is time to cancel everything and start again – domestically and internationally. It won’t happen though.

The Hundred

The hyperbole was awful, but my 5 year old knows who all the teams were and who the key players were – men and women – for all the teams. It was on BBC TV. Surely its all good?

Was it the worst thing of all time, the death knell of English cricket? Or was it the best quality of cricket since Kerry Packer? Was it even cricket? Were the counties treated with contempt? Before the tournament it seemed that people were deciding which camp to sit in and were refusing to accept any other possible point of view. It seemed to me that those against the tournament had the louder voice, but then one of the franchises talked of proving the ‘haters’ wrong. The PR was a mess. The sponsor was not ideal.

Once the tournament started this polarisation reduced, but those emotions never went away and some people did indeed refuse to watch the tournament. The cricket media certainly did not help. We had commentators and pundits endlessly proclaiming the brilliance of the tournament (Michael Vaughan and Kevin Pietersen spring to mind). Then we had awful articles that were obsessed with the sponsors more than the cricket. Matthew Engel in The Guardian clearly does not approve of the sponsor – so it seems strange that he mentioned the sponsors more than the actual team names!. Was Mike Atherton the only pundit who sat in the middle ground (though I did not hear him commentate on a game)?

So lets firstly consider the perspective of the aforementioned 5 year old – Henry. Covid has meant that Henry did not get to many T20 games this year, but he has been to a few Lancashire games before Covid. However, the concept of County Cricket is not something he really understands, and so neither does he grasp the impact of The Hundred on the counties. Of course, we live in Cheshire, not Lancashire, but the issue is keeping up with all the different formats and the varying key players. Bringing in an extra format seems counter intuitive to this last point. But the ‘short and sharp’ format with (relatively) consistent players makes it much easier for him to follow the tournament. He is now a Manchester Originals fan without a doubt – despite the fact that the Originals had a poor tournament and Old Trafford put out some dull pitches. As for the intricacies of the format…100 balls rather than 120, timouts, new batter always on strike….Henry could not care less. The runs and balls graphics and countdowns are good though – Henry gets that.

Now for my perspective – and I am a lifelong Lancs fan. I remember all those B&H and NatWest finals from the 90s. The 1996 Roses Semi Final was one of the mot exciting games I have ever seen. Richie Benaud described the last ball, saying ‘and now we have a little finish’. Those days seem to have gone sadly, and the one day final has been a secondary event for years. The Hundred fixtures were watched by big crowds. That is just a fact.

I am one of the lucky people who has been able to afford Sky for many years, so the loss of terrestrial coverage was not noticeable. However, those finals in the 90s were always on the BBC (and the semis and quarters – often switching between multiple games on the same day). So I am delighted to see the BBC giving such enthusiasm to covering The Hundred, even if Vaughan and Phil Tufnell rather struggled to avoid the jargon (it seemed almost like they were trying so hard to avoid jargon they ended up using more!). Of course, some would proffer the argument that the BBC thought they were signing up to a T20 tournament. But again, the simple fact is that county cricket has not been on the BBC and The Hundred has.

What about the format? In honesty it does seem unnecessary. It is so subtly different to T20 that it makes it hard for existing fans. I do think some of the graphics will be easier for new cricket viewers, but I am not sure you needed a new format to fix that.

The franchises? I think it is easier if the franchises are city and town based, but I do not think that means that you need to have a small number of teams. A well defined structure of leagues with promotion and relegation would seem to be possible (akin to football). But why not use the city names? I am not sure Henry would have grasped ‘Southern Brave’ or ‘Northern Superchargers’. ‘Manchester’ was clear to him. So why not Cardiff, Leeds, Nottingham? Why not 2 London teams? Why not Leicester, Northampton, Taunton? I do not see this as a malicious attempt to damage the counties (some disagree) but rather I see an obsession with franchises. The Hundred is surely lost on places like Bristol, Taunton and Durham.

As for damaging English cricket? Well, the fixture list has been a pile of poo for years. Confusing. Hard to keep up with. But read the accounts of Simon Hughes and Derek Pringle of county cricket in the 80s and you will see that fixture planning has been a problem for many decades (consider the 4 day game between Notts and Midlesex at Trent Bridge which sandwiched a Sunday league game between the same teams at Lords – thats a whole load of miles on the M1 but doubled!) But it does seem odd that in 2021 I cannot see any games at Old Trafford in the last 3 weeks of August.

The lack of investment in long form cricket? That has been a problem since 2015. The Hundred just worsens an existing probem. Stamping all over the counties? Undoubtedly, but if the county product was that good then The Hundred would never have been spawned. If this forces the counties to sort themselves out with more national consensus…well that would be no bad thnig.

So where does that leave me? Well, I thought the tournament was great. I think something new and different was needed, but I think a city based T20 series of leagues would work. The Hundred does nothing for England Cricket – but that’s nothing new.

I suspect the real test of The Hundred will be next year.

What on Earth do they do now?

The second test match featured on hour or so of the worst test match cricket I have seen from England since the Adelaide test match in 2006. That game in 2006 was also a game that was almost impossible to loose…

A lot of the pundits say this it was a great test match. I am biased of course, but I am not sure you can call it a great test match when the result is decided by basic errors – and boy did we see some basic errors on Monday morning from the England bowlers and the Captain. Joe Root has chosen to heap the blame upon himself – credit to him for that – and he did get it very wrong. But he should not take all the blame. The wider team should have enough collective knowledge and experience to realise that bowling at the stumps is the way to get batters out. They should have enough self control not to become so angry about what happened on Day 2.

I have to admit to being highly concerned by the words of Michael Vaughan on the BBC. He said that ‘he knew England expected to win’ before day 5 started. Well I would suggest that when you have failed to win the last 6 games you have played, ‘expecting’ to win is extremely arrogant. If Vaughan is right England deserved to lose.

What can England do before the next game? They have to do something if they are to avoid defeat in the next 8 scheduled games (against India and Australia – and the West Indies will be optimistic about the series in in 2022).

My only suggestion is that they take a look at the England team who faced South Africa in 1998. After the first 2 games England were 1-0 down. They had played well in the first game at Edgebaston, but the second game at Lords featured some poor cricket. Somewhat questionably, England fast bowler Dean Headley decided to attack South African pace supremo Allan Donald with some bouncers in the first innings – and the England batters suffered later at Donald’s hands. Things got worse before they got better, as England batted badly at Old Trafford but they dragged it back by holding out for a gritty draw and when on to win the series. From somewhere, they found a degree of determination. They went on to compete well in the Ashes away which was closer than the scores suggested.

In 1998 England did not change the whole team, but they found some ‘grit’. Picture from here.

In that period around 1998, we saw that the difference between being a good side and a terrible side was not that great. England see-sawed from the bad (against South Africa) to the good (against South Africa and Australia) to the very, very, very bad against New Zealand in 1999. In 2000 they won 4 consecutive series. It was pretty much the same set of players that did all that (Atherton, Stewart, Hussain, Thorpe, Gough and Caddick were in the midst) but in 1998 and 2000 they found just that little bit more. The same sort of thing happened to Australia in 2013. Australia were a rabble when they arrived in England. By the time England left Australia in 2014, we knew who was boss, and the 2010/11 England side was forever broken. The Australian players had not changed that much, but by the end of the 2013 Ashes in England the team was settled with clear roles for key players.

So it is not all about personnel but it is about attitude. That being said, England have to drop some of this team that played so badly against India. Firstly they have to show some faith in the players who have had success in first class cricket. Secondly, they have to show that the England team is not above criticism and is prepared to make changes. But thirdly, the players they do pick have to show that they have something about them – in the way Ollie Robbinson has done. England moved away from aggressive test match cricket in 2019 and it seemed to make sense. But they had more luck with aggression, even if it was up and down. This attempt to replicate the 2011 England team with big first innings runs is just not working. So I would go back to that Trevor Bayliss approach with all the lows it brings.

So what changes would I make?

Personally I would drop both openers. Surely the case of Dom Sibley is clear, he has to go. Rory Burns has made runs, but consistently fails when most needed – Monday being an example. I am also fed up with watching stupid techniques – I cannot see Burns being successful at down under while he is looking at mid wicket when the bowler runs in. So I would drop both of them – but I suspect England will persist with Burns.

Time gentlemen please. Picture from here

Haseeb Hameed is an opener so perhaps he should open the batting for England if he is going to play? How about playing players in roles they are used to? He must be given some time to succeed. So we need to look to county cricket for 3 batters to bring in. One of these will be Dawid Malan, either opening or at 3. Whilst it is tempting to say that nobody else good enough is available, a look at the first class batting averages for 2021 shows a number of players who have an average of 40 or more. The likes of Alex Lees, Alex Davies, Lewis Gregory, Tom Abell, Jake Libby. Or England could reconsider James Vince, Tom Westley or Adam Lyth, all of who looked more like test batters last time out than Burns and Sibley do now. Even Liam Livingstone has to be an option as he is clearly in the form of his life. England do actually have options, and a look at the current top 3 shows the bar is set pretty low right now.

Next we have to consider the place of Jos Buttler. Once again, we have a player who, before the stupidity of rest and rotation, was settling in to his role in the team, but now is struggling for his place. My view is that Buttler struggles unless he has a very clear role. Batting at 7 he does not know how much to ‘be a proper player’ or ‘throw the bat’ and he ends up doing neither. Jonny Bairstow on the other hand has shown the ability to be destructive at 7 where he has a good record, before he was messed around and asked to bat in every place in the team! It seems to me that Buttler has done better than Bairstow in the top 6, and Bairstow better than Buttler at number 7. Perhaps it is not what we expected or wanted from Buttler, but surely the solution is to put the players where they have had success. Bairstow gets the gloves, bats at 7 and gets until the end of the Ashes. If he fails, that is the end of his test match career. Buttler goes back to 6 and is given a clear role as a top order player. He only gets until the end of the India series to show his ability, or else he also is finished (by the way, Buttler does not become next wicket keeper in the list – Ben Foakes is next in line and then the esteemed BBC Foreign Corespondant and wicket keeper John Simpson must be worthy of consideration).

When it comes to the bowling, I would not have picked Moeen Ali at Lords but now he has been picked he has done enough to keep his place and England need to give him a good run now – again until the end of The Ashes. He goes in at 8 where he has had success before. Jimmy Anderson, Mark Wood (if fit) and Ollie Robinson play, but Sam Curran has not done enough. If Chris Woakes is fit he plays, otherwise Craig Overton plays. Saqib Mahmood and Brydon Carse must be close as cover for Mark Wood.

Whoever they pick, the England Management must commit to the players, back them but crucially give them clear roles. Make sure they know what they have to do to stay in the team. We also need to scrap this constant conversation about ‘big first innings runs’. England just do not have the players. Lets instead take a more attacking approach. It will not always work – but the current arrangement is not exactly a success either.

My team:

Hameed, Davies, Malan, Root, Vince, Buttler, Bairstow+, Ali, Robinson, Wood, Anderson

Roooooooot

England 391 (Root 180*, Siraj 4/94) lead India 364 (Rahul 129, Anderson 5/62) by 27 runs

As an England supporter I have to say something about Joe Root. At the end of England’s first innings Root was left standing again on 180 not out. I have said for several years that he is without doubt Engand’s best ODI batter of all time. Now Root must be one of England’s very best test batters of all time as well.

At one point Root was criticised because he kept getting out in the 60s. I was one of those people being critical. Then a couple of years ago he seemed to be turning into a player that got massive scores or nothing (this also happened to Sir Alistair Cook).

In the last couple of years I became worried that Root had lost some of his ‘busy-ness’ at the crease in search of the big scores. During the home series in 2020 Root struggled, but it was a unique year of course.

In 2021 Root has managed to combine that ‘busy’ player who scored all those 60s with a ruthlessness that is leading to big scores. He just keeps going and going. In the first 3 test matches of the year against Sri Lanka and India he lifted himself to a new level with those massive scores.

Against New Zealand Root seemed to be weighed down by the woes of the world but in this India series has added that cheerfulness to his batting. Root is always grinning. When he plays and misses he has this little grin that must drive bowlers mad. Even in those slightly heated conversations he will grin away.

I never played cricket at any level, but I am sure Root’s secret is technical. He has the most wonderful technique. Watching the Day 2 highlights I could not help but contrast Root and Rory Burns. Burns never stops moving, though ends up up in the right sort of place (why does he not start in the right place?). Root just stands still, but perfectly lined up.

In this innings at Lords Root went past Graham Gooch and into second place in England’s list of leading run scorers, behind only Cook. It took me back to the early 1990s when I first started to get into cricket. At that time, England had one truly world class batter in Gooch. When Gooch was in, England were in the game. In 2021 it feels like Root is filling that Graham Gooch role.

That early 90s England team was not a bad one but not a brilliant one either, but Gooch did actually have some help with Mike Athterton, Alec Stewart and Robin Smith in the team (that England could have those 4 and still be a ‘middle of the road team’ says a lot about the quality of bowling in the 90s).

In 2021 it feels like Root needs some help. He cannot continue to carry the entire batting unit on his own. Atherton and Stewart talk so often about how lucky they were to open the batting with Gooch. I am sure they learned more from standing opposite Gooch than they ever learned in the nets.

It is high time that the likes of Burns, Dom Sibley, Zak Crawley and Jos Buttler learn a bit more from Root. He is an inspiration both on and off the field (he sets a wonderful example) and, with Jimmy Anderson, is just about keeping England in this series. Somebody help him please!

What is going on with the fixture list?

So I intended to write regularly about the 2021 Cricket Season for Lancashire. Life gets in the way too much, but I have managed to come up with the occasional article. I won’t be writing much about Lancashire in August though.

Upgrade

Look at the Fixture List. Its rubbish. School holidays start quite late in July for Stockport Primaries, and then we are on holiday for a week. I went online to look at the options for taking my older son to some cricket at Old Trafford after August 8th. To say the options are sparse does not cut it. Just look at it!

Screenshot from the LCCC website

OK so we have tickets for a couple of The Hundred games. But as far as I can see, no cricket is taking place at Old Trafford between the 13th August and 10th September. What is more, Lancashire first eleven do not even have fixtures after 13th August?

Am I missing something? What is going on? How on Earth am I meant to get my kids into Cricket with hardly any cricket to take them to in August? Something does not make sense.

Utterly Pathetic

What could I be talking about? It could be that the Test Match between England and India women is being played on a USED PITCH, which is bad enough. But no, I am talking about the England men.

I am usually open minded. I try not to be over critical, I try to be fair. But sometimes, it is just too much. I did not see the game live but on Sunday afternoon I was driving up the M40 with TMS on. From an England perspective, nothing good happened from the moment England started batting on Day 3, shortly before tea. It was rubbish.

Let’s be fair, New Zealand are a good team. From what I can see, they have a great team ‘thing’ going. Sometimes it is hard to understand what makes a successful team, and in the case of New Zealand, we could attribute many factors to the success they have had in recent years. However, much of it must come from Kane Williamson, even though he was not involved in the second test match. Who can forget his reaction on being told he was ‘man of the tournament’ at the end of the World Cup? “Who, me?”. But really, if England had showed the slightest interest in taking some catches, New Zealand would not have had a first innings lead.

Having already mentioned the England women, they have shown England the way. We talk about England players not getting the preparation for test matches as they play so much T20. Well, the ladies have not played a test match at all for 2 years. Captain Heather Knight faced more balls yesterday than the England men top six in the second innings.

After the Edgbaston shambles, and it was a shambles, it is hard to know where to start. I think we have to look at 2 things – Selection and Technique. In both cases, a simple truth exists. It is OK to do unconventional things when it works, but when it goes wrong, do not be surprised if people complain.

Selection

When it comes to selection, it was fine in Sri Lanka when Ben Stokes was missing – because England won. By the time of the 4th test match it was not acceptable because England had started to loose. Resting senior players is no longer an option when you have lost 4 of the last 5 games played. Jos Buttler, Ben Stokes, Chris Woakes, Moeen Ali, Sam Curran, Jofra Archer, Mark Wood? Surely they all have to be made available for the India series if fit.

The exception is Stuart Broad and Jimmy Anderson. One aspect of the rotation policy that made 100% sense was to rotate these two greats of the game. It worked in the Covid Summer of 2020 and in Sri Lanka. But it seems to have been ‘binned’ since then, and England have started loosing. It make no sense. Rotation is not a crazy idea, but you have to be consistent with it. For me, England should look at it like this:

  • Number 8: Woakes or Curran, or Dom Bess if 2 spinners needed and Stokes is fit to bowl
  • Number 9: Archer or Wood
  • Number 10: Broad or Anderson (I would not play Broad and Anderson or Woakes and Anderson together)
  • Number 11: Jack Leach (you do not need to rotate the spinner)

Olly Stone, Ollie Robinson, Craig Overton all fit around that, probably at 8.

And of course, I have picked a spinner and considered picking 2 spinners. The idea that you do not pick 2 spinners in India is stupid. The idea that you do not pick 1 spinner at Lords is pretty dubious. The idea that you pick 4 fast bowlers and then win the toss and bat? I just do not know what you say about that, or certainly, I cannot find words that would be acceptable to share. Bring back Ed Smith!

The worst thing is that England have become arrogant. They think they are so good they can play half a team. Well – they are not. How many games will it take them to realise it?

Technique

Nasser Hussain has developed a real skill for ‘nailing it’. He did it again on Sky Sports. The England batters are saying that they are right, and everyone else is wrong. Hussain is right and it will not do. However, Sir Alistair Cook was keen to remind us that these techniques have got these players into the England team, but agreed with Michael Vaughan who says it is all about mindset. Jeremy Coney was delighted to see the New Zealand win, but kept asking how this type of failure can occur when you have the resources of English Cricket. Certainly nobody is wrong.

For me, the greatest failure comes from Rory Burns, who would benefit from looking at the bowler. Burns played loose drives in both innings. If Burns converts his 80 into 150, England dominate the game. After his innings at Lords though, Burns had some credit in the bank. But to play that shot in the second innings just before tea, exposing Zak Crawley who is woefully out of form? By the way, Crawley has a proper technique, but is just loose outside off stump. He needs to tighten up.

Technique is not the big deal. Cook had a strange old technique, and Graham Gooch was ahead of his time when he picked his bat up. But they made more than enough runs to make up for it. They did that by having a trusted defensive technique. They did it all over the world. They won games, they saved games. But they knew when to keep the ball out. On Sunday, England just needed to get through a few hours. They didn’t.

Time to wake up. England are loosing test matches and without some improvement, we will be back to the 90s, and Chris Silverwood will be the new Ray Illingworth.

Don’t criticise them for doing what we ask them to do

Second LV= Insurance Test, Edgbaston (day one of five) – England 258-7: Burns 81, Lawrence 67*

For several years England looked for an opener that did not exist. The selectors finally gave up on trying to turn Alex Hales or Jason Roy into David Warner, and started picking genuine openers. Guess what? The ‘fans’ still moan.

I understand that the pundits have a job, and that is to evaluate what they see. To highlight poor decision making or poor technique is part of that job. But the pundits also bemoaned the lack of ‘gritty’ openers since Sir Andrew Strauss stepped down. So I find it quite galling when they criticise the England openers for doing what we have have asked them to do – which is to ‘dig in’, Mike Atherton style. I have been really disappointed at the criticism by David Lloyd (on Sky) of Dom Sibley at Lords and Edgebaston. We cannot criticise Roy for playing loose drives then criticise Sibley for doing the opposite. What is it that we actually want?

As for the fans, well they can say what they like, it is a free county after all. Players claim to not be influenced by the media, but that was rubbish years ago and is rubbish now. Some players, such as Sir Alistair Cook, avoid social media entirely, but even Cook knew when social media was calling for him to be sacked as captain. The noise gets through eventually. And that is why I am sad to see criticism of England for doing the opposite of what we used to criticise them for doing. The problem is that the players get to the point where they do not know whether to ‘stick or twist’.

The other problem is that we were rather spoiled, pretty much from 2004 through to 2013, perhaps to 2015. Look at the quality of batting line up England could put out through that period. Consider Marcus Trescothick, Michael Vaughan, Mark Butcher, Nasser Hussain, Graham Thorpe, Andrew Strauss, Alastair Cook, Jonathan Trott, Kevin Pietersen, Paul Collingwood, Ian Bell…

In 2021, England just do not have that level of technique and temperament available. Instead, England have to pick the best options available and give them time to grow. Having picked Sibley, we know we are going to get someone who will bat and bat, whatever his strike rate. Root correctly chose to back his players at Lords, rather than pretend they were another set of players that could have chased 270 on the last day. All of the pundits seem to have chosen the same pretence. In my view, that Lords chase was never even worthy of consideration. People compared it to England at The Oval in 2013, but the situation bares no comparrison. In that game, The Ashes were safe (though not for long once the next series began).

On Day 1 at Edgebaston, the problems faced by England batsmen was when they made poor decisions, with the exception of Sibley who got a good ball. Zak Crawley was really done by the ball before he was out, but he looks all out of sorts. Root was a bit loose and Rory Burns aimed a big drive when he had another hundred ready for the taking. Ollie Pope was out on the cut shot having edged a cut earlier in his innings and James Bracey played an awful shot. Bracey is not ready yet, but lots of players were not ready when they started at test match cricket, including Graham Gooch who did ok in the end. We are not going to criticise Olly Stone for his 20, but he only got out when he aimed for a big sweep. Even Dan Lawrence was played some risky shots, but perhaps he had no choice, and by the time Day 1 finished he was looking very good, though he does get in odd positions at times.

It seems to me England are confused in approach. Sibley and Burns have curious methods, but they have methods they have developed. Crawley has a method that worked against Pakistan but we have not seen since – I think he is too loose too early. He needs to go back to Kent and work with Rob Key to tighten up. Pope and Lawrence both look like ‘cats on hot tin roofs’ when they start. If they could start better, they would probably benefit a great deal. Lawrence would do well to develop a clear method tomorrow morning – if he gets 3 figures England will go past 300 almost certainly.

England need to pick the players and given them clear instructions of the role they fill. The strength of the 2010 team was clarity of role. Having given that clarity of role, we all need to respect that and allow the players time to make the role work. Yes, players need to adapt to situations – but let’s adapt to not loosing games first. These players are the best available, let’s back them for once.

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started